![]() |
Question about 98c response trigger |
Post Reply
|
| Author | |
evildeadash
Member
Joined: 30 August 2009 Status: Offline Points: 3 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Topic: Question about 98c response triggerPosted: 01 September 2009 at 10:01pm |
|
I'm thinking about getting one for my 98c pro. I watched a few videos of it being used and noticed that some of the markers have to be recocked after rapid firing. Is this an issue with older markers or possibly misconfiguration? If so then how is this avoided or is it caused by something else? Thanks.
|
|
![]() |
|
Mack
Moderator Group
Has no impulse! control Joined: 13 January 2004 Location: 2nd Circle Status: Offline Points: 9906 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 02 September 2009 at 2:57am |
|
This is a case of the marker being able to outfire the air supply. For CO2 this means that the propellant is used faster than the liquid CO2 in the tank can expand into a gas; for HPA this means that the propellant is used faster than the delivery rate of the regulator on the tank.
In either case, any modifications that make the marker more efficient will allow more shots before recocking is necessary. With CO2 an expansion chamber helps with this situation while a regulator with a faster recharge rate can mitigate the problem with HPA. (No, I don't know the recharge rates of various regulators . . . maybe others will share their thoughts on this.) |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
Post Reply
|
|
|
Tweet
|
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |