C3 |
Post Reply |
Author | ||
vozzy
Member Joined: 23 March 2011 Location: Indiana Status: Offline Points: 3 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: 23 March 2011 at 6:24pm |
|
Why was the C3 and concept of propane markers abandoned?
|
||
Famous14
Member Joined: 26 October 2010 Status: Offline Points: 37 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
All I know is for one, they didn't sell as many C3's as they expected and probably dropped the idea because of financial losses.
|
||
https://sites.google.com/site/nochoppaintball/home/DSC05109.JPG?attredirects=0
|
||
vozzy
Member Joined: 23 March 2011 Location: Indiana Status: Offline Points: 3 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
It WAS released at a bad time for pumps, A5 was fairly new, who wanted a pump?
|
||
Yomillio
Platinum Member Retard Joined: 31 July 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 3398 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
The A5 was released years before the C3, though it is true that the C3 slightly preceded the current pump boom. The C3 in particular was heavy, not smooth, not upgradeable, and suffered from lack of "ease of use". It could be revisited, but again the C3 was a major loosing proposition and the need for propane powered markers doesn't really exist as most people can get at least one of either CO2 or HPA near them.
|
||
vozzy
Member Joined: 23 March 2011 Location: Indiana Status: Offline Points: 3 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
|
||
The Guy
Platinum Member Soup Can Guy Joined: 18 March 2004 Status: Offline Points: 6666 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
The point was trying to launch a new arm of the paintball industry. Apparently paintball is resistant to change. Just look what happened with the .50 cal disaster.
|
||
Post Reply | |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |