![]() |
Palmer Stabilizer VS BL torpedo |
Post Reply
|
| Author | |
seth_turner_04
Member
Joined: 21 March 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 48 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Topic: Palmer Stabilizer VS BL torpedoPosted: 27 April 2005 at 10:04pm |
|
OK I got a model 98 and am looking to get a reg...I want to get a male version regulator for my gun. I know I have to get a VA. I know a stabilizer is the best for c02 but its also 40 bucks more than a torpedo.....does a torpedo do a good job at regulating pressure with co2? Is there a big enough performance difference between the two to justify spending 40 bucks more for the stabilizer? |
|
![]() |
|
brihard
Platinum Member
Strike 1 - Making stuff up Joined: 05 September 2004 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 10155 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 28 April 2005 at 12:44am |
|
Go with the stabilizer. It's specifically designed for CO2.
|
|
|
"Abortion is not "choice" in America. It is forced and the democrats are behind it, with the goal of eugenics at its foundation."
-FreeEnterprise, 21 April 2011. Yup, he actually said that. |
|
![]() |
|
SuzukiRider987
Platinum Member
Joined: 15 October 2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 5643 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 28 April 2005 at 2:04pm |
|
The torpedo reg does work with co2 but the Stabalizer is better for it.
|
|
![]() |
|
ztbisme
Member
Joined: 22 July 2004 Status: Offline Points: 288 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 28 April 2005 at 2:54pm |
|
Spring for the Palmer, its worth it.
|
|
![]() |
|
Post Reply
|
|
|
Tweet
|
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |