When did Indiana Jones

I lol'd hard when my manager told me about the new movie.

I saw it today.

It was disappointing but was pretty decent anyways.

Aliens aren't any more mythical than anything allready seen in Indie movies. (hundreds of year old man... removal of heart with hand while still alive... etc...)

I hate Shia LaBeouf so much. He basically ruined the movie for me. I was entirely pissed off when he showed up on screen.

Tolgak wrote: I really hope they weren't serious in the implication that LaBeouf might become the next Indiana Jones.

Ummm I hope not....

I don't mind him as a tag along like this one, but to take the place would be ridiculous

havent seen it yet. I like Shia as an actor to. 

Yeah because Steven Spielberg has never done an Alien movie.

Ford has already said he has signed on for two more "Indy" movies which gradually "pass the torch" from Harrison Ford's "Indiana Jones" to Shia LeBouef's "Mutt".

tallen702 wrote: Ford has already said he has signed on for two more "Indy" movies which gradually "pass the torch" from Harrison Ford's "Indiana Jones" to Shia LeBouef's "Mutt".

I think I just threw up in my mouth.

When will people realize that LeBouef isin't able to play any other characters than the stereotypical idiot teenager that he plays in every movie?

They should have just left the series where it was.

Edited by carl_the_sniper - 26 May 2008 at 8:20am

Evil Elvis wrote: Yeah because Steven Spielberg has never done an Alien movie.

i want to see it so i can create my own opinions on it. it looks good and bad at the same time. weird.

I'm not really sure why people are almost wanting to dislike this movie. In any comparison to the previous movies, it's an unlikely hero (part time teacher/part time action junkie) searching to find things that are mythical and utterly unrealistic. The addition of a sidekick was inevitable and seen in Temple of Doom. Other than a few somewhat cheesy parts (like in every one of the previous movies) I thought it was pretty good. I'd go see it again with someone who hasn't seen it yet.

Dune wrote: I'm not really sure why people are almost wanting to dislike this movie. In any comparison to the previous movies, it's an unlikely hero (part time teacher/part time action junkie) searching to find things that are mythical and utterly unrealistic. The addition of a sidekick was inevitable and seen in Temple of Doom. Other than a few somewhat cheesy parts (like in every one of the previous movies) I thought it was pretty good. I'd go see it again with someone who hasn't seen it yet.

I have a feeling that the real fans of the old ones didn't like this one and people who weren't into the first ones as much loved this.

Seems to be the reaction that I am getting anyways.

Nobody is complaining about the things you mentioned. (nobody here anyways)

The four major things that just killed the movie for me are:

1)Shia LaBeouf

2)The inclusion of the alien ship. It was stupid, entirely pointless, and could have been taken out from the movie for the amount of time it was on screen.

3) The stupid cliches. (eg. Their treasure WAS knowledge)

3)Shia LaBeouf

I really liked the russian spin on the nazis from the previous movies. (done extremely well)

Also, did anyone notice during the nuclear test zone scenes (which were about an unrealistic as the alien scenes but whatever) that the house he ran into looked exactly like his boyhood house shown in the tird movie?

I was actually expecting him to run in and see Sean Connery. (I won't spoil it but I was disappointed)

.357 Magnum wrote: I'm not seeing it because of Lebuff. I heard they had to paint a beard/5:00 shadow on him because he couldn't grow one...

If you close your eyes on the scenes that he was in, than it was a half decent movie.