Tippmann Paintball Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > News And Views > Thoughts and Opinions
  New Posts New Posts
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Scary thought

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123>
Author
Message
reifidom View Drop Down
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Avatar
Zatoichi

Joined: 10 June 2002
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 7420
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote reifidom Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Scary thought
    Posted: 27 February 2006 at 1:00pm
Something just occurred to me sitting here at lunch: Terrorists do not need to sneak a nuclear weapon into the United States. They're already here. The greatest part of the US' nuclear arsenal is in missle silos scattered throughout the midwest, up and down the center of our mainland, buried under cornfields, hills, and other very public land. In the event of nuclear war, these silos would open and launch, but, pending war, they sit and wait.

If a terrorist knew what it took to penetrate a silo and had the know how to extract the core of the warhead, they would have a functioning nuclear weapon within the confines of our borders, and would be a simple drive from a major city. Further, with adequate preparation, the nuke could be prepared to go off at a moments notice, so it wouldn't matter if they were caught. A bomb like that going off anywhere inside the US, in or out of a major city, would cause mass chaos.

The trick is knowing what kind of security these places have. There is no resident staff, and very few silos would be visible from the roads. I can't imagine that somebody in charge of this stuff hasn't thought of this by now, but it just occurred to me.

Creepy.

Back to Top
impulse! View Drop Down
Gold Member
Gold Member
Avatar
Guested - Repeat Offender

Joined: 05 September 2005
Location: Germany
Status: Offline
Points: 1715
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote impulse! Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 27 February 2006 at 1:08pm
I highly doubt a nuclear missle silo is sitting by itself with no security.
Back to Top
Snake6 View Drop Down
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Avatar
Outranked by guitarguy?

Joined: 11 September 2003
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 11229
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Snake6 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 27 February 2006 at 1:10pm
There are alot of factors involved with ICBM warheads, multiple saftey features to prevent this type of thing from happening. The security is amazing. If you want I could go into an in-depth analisys of what it would theoretically take to penertrate such a facility, and what the government reponse would be, and the complex logistics involved. But I really don't feel like going into it right now, maybe in a hour or two when I bored out of my mind.
Back to Top
reifidom View Drop Down
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Avatar
Zatoichi

Joined: 10 June 2002
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 7420
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote reifidom Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 27 February 2006 at 1:13pm
I'd be curious to know. I can imagine that they must have some fairly involved security, but with the amount of time you'd have to plan it might be possible.

I don't figure it's as easy as I stated above, but the idea seems like something a determined group could pull off.

Edit: Ok, I see that the missles only remain in North Dakota and Montana, and that protestors and others have been arrested for trespassing or getting too close. It's good to know that it's not as haphazzard as I'd have originally thought. I'll have to find out more about the silos.

And good to know the empty silos are going to good use. :)

Retired silo here in Kansas

Edited by reifidom - 27 February 2006 at 1:20pm

Back to Top
ShortyBP View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group

A G F Y

Joined: 10 June 2002
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 5034
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote ShortyBP Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 27 February 2006 at 1:20pm
I don't know specifics, but the silos are very secure.

My dad was assigned to Minuteman silos in the late 60s/early 70s. Long two-person shifts underground... nothing much to do... but I guess it was the perfect duty for one to work on their Masters Degree on the Air Force's dime.

A determined group can pull off anything... but in this case, the group that constructed the silo system was determined themselves... and those assigned to defend the silo systems are determined as well. To gain access, one would need a lot of equipment, and a lot of time. Even with the necessary equipment... the time needed to put that equipment to use would not be sufficient to allow entry before multiple security detachments reached your position.

Even if the outer defenses were breached... the doors and safeguards from within the silos themselves are substantial. If ever visiting in the Tucson area... you can tour an old [obsolete] Titan silo. Very impressive, and those pre-date current ICBM silos by quite a bit.

Edited by ShortyBP - 27 February 2006 at 3:54pm
Back to Top
reifidom View Drop Down
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Avatar
Zatoichi

Joined: 10 June 2002
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 7420
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote reifidom Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 27 February 2006 at 1:22pm
I'd love to tour one. I'd imagine it's every bit as impressive as you say. I was thinking it might be possible to dig down and burrow into the side.

Back to Top
Snake6 View Drop Down
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Avatar
Outranked by guitarguy?

Joined: 11 September 2003
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 11229
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Snake6 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 27 February 2006 at 1:24pm
A determined highly trained group of about 50 soldiers armed with heavy weaponry for penetration and perimeter security plus a group of 10-15 missle technicions with the proper equipment might be able to preform a warhead seperation in appoximatly a hour from the time the hatch is popped on the silo. Then you would have to transport the warhead to a secure location to reconfigure the weapon to allow it to be used in a truck-bomb type configuration. The reconfiguration would take anywhere from a day to 2 weeks, depnding on the type of weapon that you are trying to create. But w/e most likely by the time you forced entry into the base and popped the silo hatch there would be a fast reaction force composed of at least a battalion plus Close Air Support Aircraft and Bombers on the way to eliminate you. It is close to impossible to pull off. Theoretically possible, yes. Realistically, No.
Back to Top
procarbinefreak View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group
Avatar
Budget Medical Procedures Available

Joined: 12 June 2002
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 12920
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote procarbinefreak Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 27 February 2006 at 1:29pm
one of the most interesting threads in T&O i've seen in a while... 


and i would love to tour an old missle silo... would definitely be interesting
Back to Top
Panda Man View Drop Down
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Avatar
I’ll feed you to my SNAKE!! METALFACE!!

Joined: 25 July 2004
Location: Neutral Zone
Status: Offline
Points: 10605
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Panda Man Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 27 February 2006 at 1:32pm
you also have to remember our own Nuclear Shootdown capabilities, if one was launched from Montana going to DC or NY, The Armed forces would pick that up in a matter of seconds, and it would be taken down within minutes, don't know if that short of a range would need to leave our atmosphere but I'd rather see some farmland in Ohio obliterated then see millions of people disappear.. 

Edit: Nukes, Bombs, etc... I don't think that would work anymore, that's too... Cold Warish, I say if you wanna really cripple America Drop us off a Virus like the one in Terminator 3, Americans are crippled without Electronic-Communications.


Edited by Panda Man - 27 February 2006 at 1:35pm
Back to Top
reifidom View Drop Down
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Avatar
Zatoichi

Joined: 10 June 2002
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 7420
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote reifidom Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 27 February 2006 at 1:36pm
The launch would be too tricky I'd think. Reconfiguring it to a land based bomb would be more practical and more adaptable.

Also, the aim here would not necessarily be destruction. A nuclear bomb going off anywhere in the US would cause mass panic, whether in a big city or not. The very idea that a nuke made it into our heartland would be more than enough.

Back to Top
ShortyBP View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group

A G F Y

Joined: 10 June 2002
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 5034
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote ShortyBP Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 27 February 2006 at 1:37pm
Originally posted by reifidom reifidom wrote:

I'd love to tour one. I'd imagine it's every bit as impressive as you say. I was thinking it might be possible to dig down and burrow into the side.
Ground sensors everywhere.    They'd know you were coming. Plus, keep in mind, these silos were built to withstand near-direct hits from incoming nuclear warheads. We're talking THICK reinforced construction, and not just on top.

Back to Top
Snake6 View Drop Down
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Avatar
Outranked by guitarguy?

Joined: 11 September 2003
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 11229
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Snake6 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 27 February 2006 at 1:40pm
A more realistic way to execute a nuclear attack on the US would be to take over a derilcit ICBM facilty in Kakizstan or someplace like fire a old Soviet ICBM. Old ICBMs especially Soviet ones were lacking in safety features like remote detonation and such. That way it would look as if a nuclear attack was being excuted from the former USSR on the US. This would cuase a retalitory attack by the US, which would cause a retalitory strike by all of NATO, which would cuase a relatitory strike by Russia, which would make Isriel attack Iran.

Now thats Scary.
Back to Top
ShortyBP View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group

A G F Y

Joined: 10 June 2002
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 5034
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote ShortyBP Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 27 February 2006 at 1:47pm
Originally posted by Panda Man Panda Man wrote:

you also have to remember our own Nuclear Shootdown capabilities

What Nuclear Shootdown capabilities? I know of no such workable system in existance. As of now, they exist only in fictional novels and movies.

Even systems that you may think are workable systems, such as PAC-3 or SM-3, or even the Airborne Laser system in testing... only effective against shorter range tactical ballistics... not incoming ICBMs.
GBI that we're pouring tons of cash into has failed consistantly.

Basically, if it were ever a scenario where we had incoming MIRVs from an ICBM... say goodbye to whatever they're targeted against.
Domestically, I don't foresee a self-targeted launch as a possibility. This would be more of a case of a foreign launched weapon. Much like Snake6's scenario.

Edited by ShortyBP - 27 February 2006 at 1:48pm
Back to Top
amishman89 View Drop Down
Member
Member
Avatar
Wow if I’d have a TITLE it woud be great

Joined: 17 October 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 610
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote amishman89 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 27 February 2006 at 2:04pm

Originally posted by reifidom reifidom wrote:

Something just occurred to me sitting here at lunch: Terrorists do not need to sneak a nuclear weapon into the United States. They're already here. The greatest part of the US' nuclear arsenal is in missle silos scattered throughout the midwest, up and down the center of our mainland, buried under cornfields, hills, and other very public land. In the event of nuclear war, these silos would open and launch, but, pending war, they sit and wait.

If a terrorist knew what it took to penetrate a silo and had the know how to extract the core of the warhead, they would have a functioning nuclear weapon within the confines of our borders, and would be a simple drive from a major city. Further, with adequate preparation, the nuke could be prepared to go off at a moments notice, so it wouldn't matter if they were caught. A bomb like that going off anywhere inside the US, in or out of a major city, would cause mass chaos.

The trick is knowing what kind of security these places have. There is no resident staff, and very few silos would be visible from the roads. I can't imagine that somebody in charge of this stuff hasn't thought of this by now, but it just occurred to me.

Creepy.

This scernerio is indeed creepy it is very unlikely to happen. Could be a good story line for a Hollywood movie. I doubt someone could "sneak" in a silo. Very unlikely. 

Only Hugh can prevent florist friars.
Back to Top
reifidom View Drop Down
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Avatar
Zatoichi

Joined: 10 June 2002
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 7420
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote reifidom Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 27 February 2006 at 2:10pm
Hmm, a functioning, yet decrepit, missle silo from another country would be a pretty workable alternative, assuming you could work out the launch and targeting. Whatever wasn't automatic that is. The security probably would be a lot less of an issue.

Do we still have systems to auto-lauch retalitory strikes or did that end with the Cold War? I can see how they'd be a deterrent, but in this case it would be a horrible mistake, retalliating against an imagined strike by a nation instead of a terrorist act designed to provoke a massive response.

Back to Top
Snake6 View Drop Down
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Avatar
Outranked by guitarguy?

Joined: 11 September 2003
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 11229
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Snake6 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 27 February 2006 at 2:25pm
The Targeting of a Soviet ICBM is auto configured. There were chip-sets that were custom for each missle that dealt with the targeting. Pretty much the Terrorist would have to find a working silo(because most derilict silos have fallen into disrepair, and ope tha tthe silo that they captured was targeted on US, where it doesn't matter because any missle targeted on the US would be cause of an immediate retalatory attack.

There was never an Automated response system. All nuclear launches had to ba approved by NCA no matter what.
Back to Top
reifidom View Drop Down
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Avatar
Zatoichi

Joined: 10 June 2002
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 7420
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote reifidom Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 27 February 2006 at 2:27pm
That's good at least. No mutually assured destruction.

I remember an earlier show of Michael Moore's (back when I could still stand him sometimes) when he went to Russia to get a missle directed away from the area where he lived. He wanted it pointed at another city, and was trying to get in to see somebody at the missle site.

Back to Top
Hades View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group
Avatar

Joined: 10 May 2003
Location: Virgin Islands
Status: Offline
Points: 13014
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Hades Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 27 February 2006 at 2:33pm
Hah! Funny you should mention Mr. Moore.

Not to sidetrack your thread but I am personally more afriad of being locked in the same room with with Moore then a terrorist nuclear attack.

Back to Top
merc View Drop Down
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Avatar
American Scotchy

Joined: 10 June 2002
Location: VA, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 7112
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote merc Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 27 February 2006 at 2:46pm
Originally posted by ShortyBP ShortyBP wrote:

Originally posted by reifidom reifidom wrote:

I'd love to tour one. I'd imagine it's every bit as impressive as you say. I was thinking it might be possible to dig down and burrow into the side.
Ground sensors everywhere.    They'd know you were coming. Plus, keep in mind, these silos were built to withstand near-direct hits from incoming nuclear warheads. We're talking THICK reinforced construction, and not just on top.



funny note about ground sensors...

i had a buddy who spent time in the seabees. not sure if he was in quam or bosnia at the time but one day he and a group of his fellow enlisted men got bored and started rolling big 150-200lb rocks down the hill next to his base...

about 3 mins later a string of M1A1s showed up at the gate locked and loaded ready to whoop some butt...

i guess it looked like there was a large group of infentry moving around on the hill and freaked someone out...
saving the world, one warship at a time.
Back to Top
DBibeau855 View Drop Down
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Avatar
IIIIIMMMMM BAAACCCKKK

Joined: 26 November 2002
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 11662
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote DBibeau855 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 27 February 2006 at 2:55pm
Well, what should really concern all of you is that only something like 5% of all shipping containers listed on ship manifests are searched. Thats 95 percent getting into the country all willy nilly and ballywho, and thats not talking about the undeclaired containers..

From these unchecked containers we get sex slave workers, sweathshop workers, a small amount of illeagals, drugs and whatnot.

It would be just, stupifyingly easy to get some sort of threat through, be it a bomb or an operator or whatever you want.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123>
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.04
Copyright ©2001-2021 Web Wiz Ltd.

This page was generated in 0.344 seconds.