![]() |
REduce unemployment |
Post Reply
|
Page 123 4> |
| Author | |
oldsoldier
Moderator Group
Crazy old guy Joined: 10 June 2002 Status: Offline Points: 6725 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Topic: REduce unemploymentPosted: 19 August 2010 at 9:43am |
|
Just been sitting here reading a local paper article, and the premise therein, which I agree with. With the current level of unemployment and world condition a return to a selesctive service draft (yes I said it) may be worth a look. For generations the military supplied youth with a job, pay, and most important eligability for benifits both during and post service.
As today's volunteer military is forced to deploy multiple times, a larger short term force (ie the draftee bolstered units with 3 yr enlistments)would balance the manpower issues. Not to repeat the Vietnam era draftee problems but on the mold of WW2 draftees. The benifits outweigh the predictable not me reasons in todays economic and social enviornment. A sense of duty, personal development and direction, a good paycheck with benifits for the soldier and fledgeling family, housing, medical care, and potential career training. Post service there would be education benifits, employment preference, medical benifits, leadership training and most of all expieriance for that all important resume. And yes I would also see a draft into Peace Corp type organizations both domestic and serving overseas as an alternative to military service for those who can not perform in a military enviornment, as well as not limiting the draft to males. At 18 years old those who do not or can not afford to go to college face a serious uphill battle, job skills and education are available, for a fair trade. Generations benifited, and the draft contrary to current popular belief would actually limit the potential of a war deployment being that there are more troops than need. In todays 'what are you going to do for me' mindset, a 'this is what you can do for yourself' may be a good thing. Now comes the usual not me arguements...so lets debate...National Service could solve several current economic issues for youth. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
Benjichang
Moderator Group
I pwned Leroy Jenkins! Joined: 03 January 2004 Location: Ohiya Status: Offline Points: 12618 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 19 August 2010 at 10:00am |
|
Sounds like socialism to me.
|
|
![]() irc.esper.net #paintball |
|
![]() |
|
oldsoldier
Moderator Group
Crazy old guy Joined: 10 June 2002 Status: Offline Points: 6725 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 19 August 2010 at 10:04am |
|
Socialism is youth sitting around demanding benifits for nothing, this is a 'fair trade' of services agreement.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
mbro
Moderator Group
Original Forum Gangster Joined: 11 June 2002 Location: Isle Of Man Status: Offline Points: 10750 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 19 August 2010 at 10:08am |
|
Sounds like a lot more government spending.
<serious> I don't think you'd find any general who wants to return to having draftees. <serious> |
|
Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos. |
|
![]() |
|
Benjichang
Moderator Group
I pwned Leroy Jenkins! Joined: 03 January 2004 Location: Ohiya Status: Offline Points: 12618 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 19 August 2010 at 10:21am |
We're all trying to get by, just like everyone else. I don't except anything for free from anyone, and I don't think many people my age (24) do either. edit- Maybe I misunderstood you. Are you claiming that "youth sitting around demanding benefits for nothing", is what is happening now?
Edited by Benjichang - 19 August 2010 at 10:22am |
|
![]() irc.esper.net #paintball |
|
![]() |
|
stratoaxe
Platinum Member
And my axe... Joined: 21 May 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 6839 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 19 August 2010 at 10:29am |
|
Every military person I know would disagree with you. Volunteer army creates a more professional morale, rather than a bunch of people who didn't want to be there fighting for something they don't believe in (Vietnam?).
And as was already pointed out in this thread, I don't know any unemployed guys my age. They're all struggling to stay above bills, and go to college, but they're working. I'm guessing this thread was started when a bunch of kids wouldn't get off OS's lawn... |
|
![]() |
|
oldsoldier
Moderator Group
Crazy old guy Joined: 10 June 2002 Status: Offline Points: 6725 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 19 August 2010 at 10:30am |
|
Actually it has been thrown around the Joint Chiefs and the benifits outweigh the negatives. Again not to repeat the Vietnam draft era mistakes, but go back to the WW2 adaptations.
Most of the WW2 force was draftees, and worked out well, Korea the same, due to the social climate as well as 'cannon fodder' and out mentality of the Vietnam War, the draftee was not given the same opertunities his father was in WW2. The reduction in benifits alone from the WW2/Korea draftee to what the level was with the Vietnam and post Vietnam era was a national disgrace. America is a teamwork culture once trained (and to use a no better world 'conditioned'), there would actually be no decernable difference in performance between enlistee and draftee once place in a unit and need to relie on each other. The interaction between the enlistee and draftee in Vietnam was no differant than in the civilian society, each was conditioned through training or need to depend on each other. As long as the 'cannon fodder' mindset does not return to the commander and the troop the system will self correct on its own. Until you actually expieriance the basic training enviornment and see the technique work, it is hard to explain. Man is a social creature, and a pack animal in times of stress. Edited by oldsoldier - 19 August 2010 at 10:42am |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
oldsoldier
Moderator Group
Crazy old guy Joined: 10 June 2002 Status: Offline Points: 6725 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 19 August 2010 at 10:41am |
|
Benji you misunderstand. The current economy has many areas into high 20% unemployment rates, with youth hardest hit. The 'benifits' packages are overwhelming the already limited tax base. So a 'fair exchange' of National Service for a short period for benifits helps both sides of the equation.
"Ask not what your country can do for you, but what you can do for your country.." JFK A band-aid for the current problem, give a sense of self worth over furthering a culture of dependancy. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
stratoaxe
Platinum Member
And my axe... Joined: 21 May 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 6839 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 19 August 2010 at 10:41am |
|
I understand the military mindset, I'm the only male in three generations of my family not to serve in the military, and that's only because I was rejected due to asthma (insert nerd joke....here).
Where I disagree is the old school mindset that the military is good for everyone. I can name off several people that joined the military and came out more lazy and government dependent than when they went in. It's all well and good to envision lining up a bunch of emos to boot camp, and they come out all fresh cut and ready to join the workforce, but I think history has proven that a pipe dream at best. More than likely if you drafted a bunch of lazy, mindless potheads, they'd do their time and come out dependent on disability from the military the rest of their life.
I can't see that as being economically prosperous.
I'd like to point out something else as well-while you're spot on about the "cannon fodder" mentality in Vietnam, there's another element that made Vietnam such a morale disaster-the people didn't support or understand the war.
And unfortunately, lots of people don't understand or support the current conflicts we're involved in. So I think a modern day draft would present a whole host of new issues, and wind up igniting 'Nam era resentment of the government among youth.
The army isn't for everybody.
|
|
![]() |
|
Tolgak
Platinum Member
Master of MSPaint and bri's Daddy Joined: 12 July 2002 Location: BEHIND YOU! Status: Offline Points: 1239486 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 19 August 2010 at 10:44am |
|
It's going to increase taxes quite a bit. You still down?
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
oldpbnoob
Platinum Member
Not old, Not noob. May be Dave's grandma Joined: 04 February 2008 Location: Yankee Stadium Status: Offline Points: 5676 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 19 August 2010 at 10:46am |
|
I'll make a prediction. The older among the forumers will lean more towards agreeing with this, and the younger will be against it....
|
|
|
"When I grow up I want to marry a rich man and live in a condor next to the beach" -- My 7yr old daughter.
|
|
![]() |
|
oldsoldier
Moderator Group
Crazy old guy Joined: 10 June 2002 Status: Offline Points: 6725 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 19 August 2010 at 10:47am |
|
Again a National Service to include domestic service agencies as well as the military.
The generalization of the Vietnam era pothead collecting disability for life is false. Department of Veterans Affairs numbers show that the Vietnam and post Vietnam military are far more successfull than the minute percentage of 'non-conforming' personalities. The propaganda of the less than 1% representing the Veteran is a false pretense, over 99% continued on with life, and in hindsight find the expieriance benifited rather than hindered thier later lives. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
oldsoldier
Moderator Group
Crazy old guy Joined: 10 June 2002 Status: Offline Points: 6725 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 19 August 2010 at 10:51am |
|
Actually taxes will reamin the same, the outlay of 'benifits' will be balanced with a return of a higher 'consumer' spending trend with the related sales taxes, all a balance. Even conscription countries find that a national service period for youth encourages responsible spending both in government and the youth within the service programs.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
stratoaxe
Platinum Member
And my axe... Joined: 21 May 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 6839 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 19 August 2010 at 10:53am |
Again, I can name a few Iraq war vets on disability that are perfectly fine.
Now, this is the part where all the military guys on the forum flame me with "OMG U DONT KNOW WHAT ITS LIKE SHUT THE MONKEY UP", and I'm all for giving our guys what they deserve.
But people are going to abuse the system. They're going to claim PTSD, bogus health problems, so and so forth, when they never even saw conflict.
And so when you weigh all this out, combined with the inevitable degradation of military standards, I don't see the benefit of a draft.
*edit* to put it another way, the military isn't going to magically change lazy, unmotivated people into hard working individuals. It may some, but it'll simply give many of them a whole new outlet of options to stay lazy and unmotivated. Edited by stratoaxe - 19 August 2010 at 10:55am |
|
![]() |
|
oldsoldier
Moderator Group
Crazy old guy Joined: 10 June 2002 Status: Offline Points: 6725 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 19 August 2010 at 11:03am |
|
Like the current welfare and disability programs are not abused. And you said it, this generation has less of a sense of duty than past generations and are conditioned and 'trained' to abuse the system as it is.
"I'm not talking about Vietnam era potheads, I'm talking about 2010 era potheads. " Do you understand the actual effects of PTSD? I am rated for PTSD and am considered fine. Disability for military sevice is a condition of the contract agreement. I am 100% disabled based on a total of service connected issues. Yet I do things that you would consider 'abusing' the system. I can sit down and die and conform to the norm, or continue to live. I worked while on 100% VA disability, the system is designed for that, the only reason I can not work now is the potential of heart attack and stroke and employers will not take on the liability issues, I have tried. Again I do what I do to live, if I die tomorrow I died enjoying myself and the last benifit government will need to pay is that granite headstone. Edited by oldsoldier - 19 August 2010 at 11:11am |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
oldsoldier
Moderator Group
Crazy old guy Joined: 10 June 2002 Status: Offline Points: 6725 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 19 August 2010 at 11:07am |
|
Speaking about yourself? It has been done, and can be done again, trust me..........
"*edit* to put it another way, the military isn't going to magically change lazy, unmotivated people into hard working individuals. It may some, but it'll simply give many of them a whole new outlet of options to stay lazy and unmotivated." Just watch Full Metal Jacket, represents what you can understand about mental conditioning, believe me it was a lot worse in your fathers and my era in BT. Peer presure and an instilled sense of pride in self will correct many social problems, something current society and culture do not instill in the young mind as a priority. Edited by oldsoldier - 19 August 2010 at 11:10am |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
DaveEllis
Moderator Group
back from the dead like Tupac Joined: 24 October 2002 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 7517 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 19 August 2010 at 11:09am |
|
Your revolution is over Mr. Lebowksi. My advice is to do what your parents did, sir. The bums will always lose.
DID YOU HEAR ME MR. LEBOWSKI, THE BUMS WILL ALWAYS LOSE! |
|
![]() |
|
Benjichang
Moderator Group
I pwned Leroy Jenkins! Joined: 03 January 2004 Location: Ohiya Status: Offline Points: 12618 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 19 August 2010 at 11:10am |
|
That's just like, your opinion, man.
|
|
![]() irc.esper.net #paintball |
|
![]() |
|
stratoaxe
Platinum Member
And my axe... Joined: 21 May 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 6839 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 19 August 2010 at 11:15am |
Before I say any more, let me just say that I fully endorse giving every possible benefit to veterans. That's not the point of this rant.
What I'm trying to do here is expose the flaw in your thinking with the draft. You, as I do, recognize the disabilities attributed to experiencing combat.
Yet, you want to expose the vast majority of the young workforce to those same disabilites.
What I'm trying to say as that all of these people on welfare and that are abusing the system are going to be drafted, and then abuse that system. And that system is for life.
I don't see the economic benefit.
As far as PTSD, both my dad and my brother are receiving benefits due to PTSD. I'm VERY well versed in what PTSD is. My dad is 100% from PTSD and hearing loss directly related to his service in Vietnam.
|
|
![]() |
|
tallen702
Moderator Group
Hipster before Hipster was cool... Joined: 10 June 2002 Location: Under Your Bed Status: Offline Points: 11857 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 19 August 2010 at 11:19am |
|
Alright, time to introduce a little statistics into this otherwise speculative argument.
The Department of Labor recently published a finding that 37% of 18-24 year olds not in college are currently unemployed. Of those 37% unemployed, 23% are not actively searching for a job and the remaining 14% have said that they would refuse an offer for a well paid position if it wasn't exactly what they were looking for. What this says to me is that Gen Y isn't taking the economic situation nearly as seriously as they should. For starters, that is the highest unemployment rate in that age range since the great depression. Secondly, the entire generation has been told that they can grow up to be whatever they want to be, which has created a surplus of individuals with useless degrees in subjects such as philosophy, sculpture, dance, and other fields of limited capacity. I think that we're going to see a breakdown in the not too distant future. We're going to see the same loss of a generation just as we did with the dust bowl and the great depression. Gen Y, while many will be successful, will be marred with a disproportionate number of deadbeats who will ultimately wind up working menial tasks much like the dust-bowl farmers who picked up and moved to the central valley of California. I also think you're going to see a resurgence of manufacturing and labor based jobs here in the US in the next several decades. China has outgrown their ability to produce cheap goods. The living wage has simply grown too high for them to continue to manufacture items of decent quality at low costs. Vietnam has already picked up some of the slack, as has Thailand, but their combined workforce is simply too small to take over from China. Furthermore, the need for quality is forcing many manufacturers to charge more for their products, which, when combined with shipping costs, is making it cost prohibitive to do business here in the US. This means that much like foreign auto makers, I expect to see companies bring their production facilities back to the US to be able to compete at a higher level. That said, as to the original topic at hand, a forced draft is a horrible idea. One simply needs to look at Vietnam and the current military situation in Russia to know that conscription simply does not work within a professional military establishment. |
|
|
<Removed overly wide sig. Tsk, you know better.>
|
|
![]() |
|
Post Reply
|
Page 123 4> |
|
Tweet
|
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |