Medical Marijuana |
Post Reply | Page <1 23456 20> |
Author | ||||
Linus
Platinum Member Strike 1 - language 6.29.10 Joined: 10 November 2002 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 7908 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
That's all good and dandy, but seeing as how we went through 15 pages without anyone calling anyone a name, or acting immature in any fashion other then 'lol weed', having an adult conversation, and you were the first, "You. Are. Wrong." |
||||
|
||||
Linus
Platinum Member Strike 1 - language 6.29.10 Joined: 10 November 2002 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 7908 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
Already stated in one of the first few pages of this thread. |
||||
|
||||
TheDude
Member Joined: 14 September 2008 Location: Neutral Zone Status: Offline Points: 413 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
You know, if you can BS through 16 pages, and throw back handed insults and ridiculous fabricated factoids D.A.R.E. handed out to you in the 6th grade, then you're gad-dang right I'm going to be rude back to you. I just don't care enough to mask my ill intentions. I'll just come right out and treat you poorly. Just because you're wasting everyone's time here, and further perpetuating this seemingly endless cycle of people thinking drugs are bad because they're illegal, and they're illegal because they're bad. All the claims you've made have either been made up, or proven to be wrong via quoting medical doctor's statements.
You. Are. Wrong. "But opinions cant be wrong!!!" They can if they were formed from poor information. |
||||
"According to Sue Johanson, theres nothing that can increase your manhood, trust me I've already looked into it for myself." -Zata
<keep the sigs friendly, please> |
||||
agentwhale007
Moderator Group Forum's Noam Chomsky Joined: 20 June 2002 Location: Statesboro, GA Status: Offline Points: 12014 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
Plenty of medications have risks. Still doesn't really justify retaining illegal status. As a matter of fact I still have not heard a single good argument presented in this thread as to why it should stay illegal for medicinal purposes. I personally, don't care one way or another if it does or doesn't have legal status. Again, I just think if you are going to try to argue something, you should make sense. |
||||
jmac3
Moderator Group Official Box Hoister Joined: 28 June 2004 Status: Offline Points: 9204 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
As for your canadian toxic article. The article I found says this:
"The nitrogen-based fertilizer used on the marijuana plants -- which all came from the same batch of Canadian pot plants -- may have affected the results. The temperatures used to burn the cigarettes may also have been a factor." And now on to the vaporizers. "Use Of Vaporizers Drastically Reduces Toxins Associated With Marijuana Smoke, Study Says " "Toxins in marijuana smoke may be eliminated by the use of a vaporization device, according to the findings of a study conducted by California NORML and the Multidisciplinary Association of Psychedelic Studies (MAPS), and funded in part by the NORML Foundation. "While there is no scientific evidence linking marijuana smoking to lung cancer, vaporizers do provide an effective non-smoking delivery system that eliminates the unnecessary products of combustion," |
||||
Que pasa?
|
||||
High Voltage
Platinum Member Fire in the disco Joined: 12 March 2003 Location: 127.0.0.1 Status: Offline Points: 14179 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
Linus, the nasty chemicals are a product of combustion of the plant matter, which a vaporizer avoids. Try again.
Also, what grade of marijuana did the Canadian government test? I'd like to point out if they tested ditch weed then yes it could be more harmful than tobacco in some areas since you have to smoke much more to get the desired effect. But if it was medical grade marijuana (using that term to describe the high grade stuff you find in dispensaries) the dose would be much smaller compared to an average dose of tobacco. I would like to hear your opinion on edibles and other non smoked forms of the drug. |
||||
|
||||
Linus
Platinum Member Strike 1 - language 6.29.10 Joined: 10 November 2002 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 7908 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
And I never stated it was... but that doesn't mean it doesn't have risk factors JUST because it's vaporized... unless you can prove otherwise. That's like saying a hookah is safe. You're still inhaling a dangerous substance. Edited by Linus - 01 April 2009 at 12:05am |
||||
|
||||
Benjichang
Moderator Group I pwned Leroy Jenkins! Joined: 03 January 2004 Location: Ohiya Status: Offline Points: 12618 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
Except vaporizers != smoke...
|
||||
irc.esper.net #paintball |
||||
Linus
Platinum Member Strike 1 - language 6.29.10 Joined: 10 November 2002 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 7908 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
Glassjaw-- What I was trying to say is I can't find a single article in the years 2007,2008, or 2009, that link cannibis and Alheimers, that don't rely mostly on the out-dated Scripps study.
I'm trying to find a more recent one, as things change drastically in 28 months. |
||||
|
||||
Linus
Platinum Member Strike 1 - language 6.29.10 Joined: 10 November 2002 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 7908 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
Will do--- http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/7150274.stm
|
||||
|
||||
Benjichang
Moderator Group I pwned Leroy Jenkins! Joined: 03 January 2004 Location: Ohiya Status: Offline Points: 12618 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
<3 obnoxious
Linus, you're grasping at straws at this point. |
||||
irc.esper.net #paintball |
||||
High Voltage
Platinum Member Fire in the disco Joined: 12 March 2003 Location: 127.0.0.1 Status: Offline Points: 14179 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
No jmac, he doesn't have to prove anything he says, remember?
|
||||
|
||||
jmac3
Moderator Group Official Box Hoister Joined: 28 June 2004 Status: Offline Points: 9204 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
"Rather than burning the herb, which produces irritating, toxic, and carcinogenic
by-products, a vaporizer heats the material in a partial vacuum so that
the active compounds contained in the plant boil off into a vapor."
Also, find me your proof for your ridiculous claims about Ammonia and other toic substances. |
||||
Que pasa?
|
||||
Linus
Platinum Member Strike 1 - language 6.29.10 Joined: 10 November 2002 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 7908 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
Jmac, vaporizers don't instantly negate any ill-effects from inhaling marijuana, and I have stated that a few times in this thread.
ALso, Marijuana has many times more ammonia, and other toxic substances, then cigarettes do. Edited by Linus - 01 April 2009 at 12:01am |
||||
|
||||
jmac3
Moderator Group Official Box Hoister Joined: 28 June 2004 Status: Offline Points: 9204 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vaporizer Didn't want it to get buried. |
||||
Que pasa?
|
||||
obnoxious
Member Joined: 13 May 2007 Status: Offline Points: 142 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
No. You cannot discredit my argument just because I am arguing the morality side of the issue versus the empirical health side. I can and will do that when I feel the time is right. As of right now, I simply want to know why you think you have authority supreme enough to tell me that I cannot smoke marijuana legally when you can get trashed on Jack Daniels. I want to know why the number one cash crop in the nation is going untaxed, and rather, inversely sucking up massive amount of federal funding amidst an economic crisis. If you are unwilling to continue upon a discussion pertaining to the ethical side of a completely illogical ban on a relatively harmless substance, then you are conceding that you have no grounds by which to defend it. If you do, then I will be more than happy to join Glassjaw and yourself in a discussion on rather abject health benefits, which resonates to me as a complete travesty because legality should not be pertinent in any way on how good it is for your body. |
||||
|
||||
Glassjaw
Platinum Member Took down Mike Tyson Joined: 13 July 2004 Location: Philly Status: Offline Points: 6454 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
"In contrast to previous studies aimed at utilizing cannabinoids in Alzheimer's disease therapy, our results provide a mechanism whereby the THC molecule can directly impact Alzheimer's disease pathology... It is noteworthy that THC is a considerably more effective inhibitor... than the approved drugs for Alzheimer's disease treatment, donepezil and tacrine, which reduced [protein deposits in the brain] by only 22% and 7%, respectively, at twice the concentration used in our studies... THC and its analogues may provide an improved therapeutic for Alzheimer's disease [by] simultaneously treating both the symptoms and progression of Alzheimer's disease."Aug. 9, 2006 - Lisa Eubanks, PhD A Molecular Link Between the Active Component of Marijuana and Alzheimer's Disease Pathology (143 KB) "After reviewing the recommendations of an expert panel, we have decided to add Agitation of Alzheimer's disease to the list of medical conditions for which a doctor may write a statement of support for the medical use of marijuana." June 14, 2000 - Oregon Department of Health Services The excerpt originally posted was from a woman with her PhD. Her information can be found here. I'm not attempting to say that marijuana produces more profound medical benefits than pharmacutical drugs currently available; however, I am pointing out that marijuana does produce beneficial medical benefits. Edited by Glassjaw - 31 March 2009 at 11:54pm |
||||
|
||||
jmac3
Moderator Group Official Box Hoister Joined: 28 June 2004 Status: Offline Points: 9204 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
Edited by jmac3 - 31 March 2009 at 11:50pm |
||||
Que pasa?
|
||||
Linus
Platinum Member Strike 1 - language 6.29.10 Joined: 10 November 2002 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 7908 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
Oh, not saying GI bleeds are GOOD, but the fact that them being caused by tylenol is so rare should not be an instant win for marijuana, especially considering smoking marijuana causes harm to the lungs. Not a clear winner there. Still, I want a more neutral publication, such as from a very reputable hospital or some such thing. Found one based off a Scripps Institute study, but ALL websites that quote it don't have any update on it after October of 2006. Edited by Linus - 31 March 2009 at 11:48pm |
||||
|
||||
Glassjaw
Platinum Member Took down Mike Tyson Joined: 13 July 2004 Location: Philly Status: Offline Points: 6454 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
http://medicalmarijuana.procon.org/viewresource.asp?resourceID=000145 Interesting chart shown here. Edited by Glassjaw - 31 March 2009 at 11:42pm |
||||
|
||||
Post Reply | Page <1 23456 20> |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |