We Stopped Dreaming |
Post Reply | Page 123 11> |
Author | ||||
mbro
Moderator Group Original Forum Gangster Joined: 11 June 2002 Location: Isle Of Man Status: Offline Points: 10750 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: 30 March 2012 at 5:27am |
|||
|
||||
Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos. |
||||
zuyao
Member spammer Joined: 29 March 2012 Location: 中国 Status: Offline Points: 1 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
Edited by Mack - 29 March 2012 at 10:42pm |
||||
tallen702
Moderator Group Hipster before Hipster was cool... Joined: 10 June 2002 Location: Under Your Bed Status: Offline Points: 11850 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
Now you've done it. I've gotta go to the school tomorrow to accept a SYSCO order and do some housekeeping while there aren't any kids there. Looks like I'm gonna have to launch some rockets on the LaCross field as well. |
||||
GroupB
Gold Member Joined: 05 September 2010 Status: Offline Points: 1255 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
|
||||
|
||||
choopie911
Moderator Group Commie Canuck Joined: 01 June 2003 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 30773 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
This answer prompts the same question: What do you think NASA does? |
||||
__sneaky__
Moderator Group Voted 2010 Most Improved horse fondler. Joined: 14 January 2006 Location: Uncertain Status: Offline Points: 10000014 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
— Joseph de Lalande, member of the French Academy, 'Journal de Paris,' 18 May 1782. |
||||
"I AM a crossdresser." -Reb Cpl
Forum Vice President RIP T&O Forum |
||||
oldpbnoob
Platinum Member Not old, Not noob. May be Dave's grandma Joined: 04 February 2008 Location: Yankee Stadium Status: Offline Points: 5676 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
|
||||
"When I grow up I want to marry a rich man and live in a condor next to the beach" -- My 7yr old daughter.
|
||||
GroupB
Gold Member Joined: 05 September 2010 Status: Offline Points: 1255 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
Not with that attitude.
|
||||
|
||||
oldpbnoob
Platinum Member Not old, Not noob. May be Dave's grandma Joined: 04 February 2008 Location: Yankee Stadium Status: Offline Points: 5676 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
|
||||
"When I grow up I want to marry a rich man and live in a condor next to the beach" -- My 7yr old daughter.
|
||||
GroupB
Gold Member Joined: 05 September 2010 Status: Offline Points: 1255 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
That's likely, there are too many of them running around here.
I will say one last thing though. Just like war is the necessary evil that drives military innovation spinoffs, space exploration is the necessary "evil" that drives NASAs innovation spinoffs. If it weren't for space exploration (or some other lofty* goal), NASA would have nothing to develop for.
* See what i did there?
|
||||
|
||||
Lightningbolt
Platinum Member PHAT and PLAT Joined: 10 July 2002 Location: bumping up Status: Offline Points: 5055 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
incorporated/.$
|
||||
oldpbnoob
Platinum Member Not old, Not noob. May be Dave's grandma Joined: 04 February 2008 Location: Yankee Stadium Status: Offline Points: 5676 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
And to clarify, I do not beleive I ever endorsed cutting corporate taxation. Think you are getting your old farts mixed up Group B. Edited by oldpbnoob - 28 March 2012 at 11:36am |
||||
"When I grow up I want to marry a rich man and live in a condor next to the beach" -- My 7yr old daughter.
|
||||
stratoaxe
Platinum Member And my axe... Joined: 21 May 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 6839 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
But just as in OPB's case, who sets the standard for extreme? What value would we associate here that would give us a starting point? You both have the same problem in not establishing an idea of what "normal" spending is. If the U.S. is spending too much on its military there has to be a figure that you consider to be within reason, a size and availability that we've exceeded. The same would go for OPB's argument about NASA. Not saying either of you are wrong, but I think that both arguments are incomplete. |
||||
|
||||
Rofl_Mao
Platinum Member request denied Joined: 27 October 2008 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 3210 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
Extreme opbn is extreme. I never said all military spending is wasteful, I believe in strong national defence, but not to extreme lengths. A small-ER military that is expertly trained can be just as effective (in some cases more) as a huge military.
Just setting my case straight here - I know you're not changing your mind. |
||||
oldpbnoob
Platinum Member Not old, Not noob. May be Dave's grandma Joined: 04 February 2008 Location: Yankee Stadium Status: Offline Points: 5676 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
Veering off course here. I wont restate my main point again. Briefly, I didnt say every NASA expenditure was a waste, my main issue is with some of the more unrealistic and wasteful aspirations. I.E. putting men on Mars. I"ll also refer you to my earlier posts regarding value as it was based on ROFLs comment that military spending was a waste. Lets take it in context. I think weve beaten this one into the ground. I feel a lot of money is wastefully spent on things such as manned space exploration and things like the ISS. Its how I feel. It isnt going to change and I am not some short sighted maroon for feeling this way no more than anyone is a liberal idiot for thinking military spending is wasteful. |
||||
"When I grow up I want to marry a rich man and live in a condor next to the beach" -- My 7yr old daughter.
|
||||
choopie911
Moderator Group Commie Canuck Joined: 01 June 2003 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 30773 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
Clearly opbn prefers profit over progress. Talk about short sighted.
|
||||
stratoaxe
Platinum Member And my axe... Joined: 21 May 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 6839 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
OPB, while I see the point you're making, this is where I tend to step away from using the business model on research projects.
The reason is because that the US is largely an innovation based economy. We live and die by staying ahead of the rest of the world in new consumer technology. So I'd argue that R&D projects would fall under the investment capital side of economics, in which case the expectation is that a significant expense will be followed by a movement forward on the production curve years down the road. I don't see why NASA couldn't fit into that model of you applied it to the economy as it stands. Now how much we spend vs how much the economy benefits is an argument for one far more educated than myself, but I think that the benefits of say, cell phone technology, would be difficult to really stack up against a base number. Remember that capital purchases are a one time expense that produces a benefit that (ideally) multiplies over time until that investment is rendered obsolete by a new one. As long as Velcro, cell phones, and calculators are being produced based off of the investments made by NASA funding we won't have a real idea what percentage of profit the world turned by it. |
||||
|
||||
GroupB
Gold Member Joined: 05 September 2010 Status: Offline Points: 1255 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
Even if you don't agree with the products themselves, how can you argue against the jobs and economic growth created by them?
|
||||
|
||||
oldpbnoob
Platinum Member Not old, Not noob. May be Dave's grandma Joined: 04 February 2008 Location: Yankee Stadium Status: Offline Points: 5676 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
Disagreeing with value isn't turning a blind eye. Several factors have driven many of the improvements described above, electronics especially. Miniturization wasnt solely done for NASAs sake. Electronics would have progressed. Maybe not at the same speed, but they would have. And to be honest, if it didn't we wouldn't have known the difference wold we? Perhaps we wouldn't be sitting here discussing this on the internet today, but we would have gotten there. While many of the advancements such as cell phones, are great was it really that big of a deal? While I sit and watch my teenage daughter text her boyfriend and play games for hours on end, I might just have to argue against that one. NB4 O Noez OPBN is wanting us to go back to the stone ages yo!
|
||||
"When I grow up I want to marry a rich man and live in a condor next to the beach" -- My 7yr old daughter.
|
||||
tallen702
Moderator Group Hipster before Hipster was cool... Joined: 10 June 2002 Location: Under Your Bed Status: Offline Points: 11850 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
Seeing as how the government is forbidden from owning patents, they really can't demand compensation. Furthermore, companies outside of NASA actually made all of the components and worked hand-in-hand on the research. The reality is that NASA provided the impetus to move forward with all of the technological advances that you've been turning a blind eye to so willfully. NASA has done more to produce jobs for Americans in sustainable high-tech fields than any other organization. Period. Without the need to miniaturize computers, radios, and other components, for weight and space savings, that you'd be seeing the kind of tech we do today? We simply wouldn't. Look at consumer driven parallels from the same time. Cars are a fantastic example. Cars didn't get any smaller or fuel efficient despite better products and technologies being available in the 60's and 70's. Automobiles are perhaps one of the few areas of consumer goods which didn't take what was developed for NASA and run with it. The result was the stagnation of design over two decades. Meanwhile the consumer products closely tied to the NASA programs of the time steadily got better, smaller, more efficient. Computers went from being monstrous machines only companies could afford to models which fit the desktop and more importantly, the budget of the average family. The same can be said about TV's, radios, phones, even things like refrigerators and microwave ovens. There really wasn't a demand for a home computer, and I don't know if we'd ever have gotten one if NASA hadn't forced innovation which made the PCB and micro processor possible. We'd probably only now be getting to the point we were 30 years ago. I don't really think you'd want to see how this forum would look on an 80 baud modem and a Tandy. The reality is that NASA doesn't build things themselves, they contract out. And without them making these demands of said contractors, we wouldn't have seen the kind of innovation we have in all those fields. Again, look the fields that weren't as affected. They stagnated and are now considered by most to be 3rd place at best, and usually a whole lot worse. |
||||
Post Reply | Page 123 11> |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |