Tippmann Paintball Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > News And Views > Thoughts and Opinions
  New Posts New Posts
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

We Stopped Dreaming

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 678910 11>
Author
Message Reverse Sort Order
 Rating: Topic Rating: 6 Votes, Average 4.00  Topic Search Topic Search  Topic Options Topic Options
oldpbnoob View Drop Down
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Avatar
Not old, Not noob. May be Dave's grandma

Joined: 04 February 2008
Location: Yankee Stadium
Status: Offline
Points: 5676
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote oldpbnoob Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 13 March 2012 at 6:33pm

So we as a country should invest billions upon billions of dollars into research and development so that commercial companies can make money? Seems that much like oil shales. They aren't profitable to use unless oil is above X number of dollars per gallon. I would think the same principles should apply to building spacecraft for the purpose of mining. Why should the government foot the bill for building clean rooms in outerspace so companies worth a kagillion dollars can make semiconductors easier? Answer is, we shouldn't. The people standing to make a profit from such endevours should be the ones footing the bill. 

"When I grow up I want to marry a rich man and live in a condor next to the beach" -- My 7yr old daughter.
Back to Top
Darur View Drop Down
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Avatar
Stare directly into my avatar...

Joined: 03 May 2003
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 9178
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Darur Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 13 March 2012 at 6:24pm
Originally posted by oldpbnoob oldpbnoob wrote:

It took me a while, but it dawned on me why Darurs post bothered me. All these situations, aside from saving mankind, are activities that should be carried out by private enterprises. Neither mining, nor semiconductor manufacturing are activites that should be carried out by the government. If mining is such a tremendous and profitable activity, let the private sector have at it.  Your post is actually a near perfect support for reasons why space exploration should be privatized.


Sorry, been busy, but I'll try and address this and a few other points.

You are right that these are all activities which should be, and would be, carried out by private enterprises. The trouble is, it's just not worth the massive investment in capital for a firm to perform the research and development to overcome these hurdles. Like Whale said, the free-market is fantastic at doing things cheaply and efficiently, but it doesn't necessarily handle investing in future like this very well.

There needs to be a substantial investment to develop the tools and technology to enter space affordability, and very few private firms will be able or interested in making that investment. That's why programs like NASA are crucial. They provide the funding to make this research happen, even when the monetary returns from the research are not assured.

Now some private firms have been doing this themselves for a while. SpaceX and Virgin Galactic come to mind. But we should still be trying to provide incentives for this type of research.
Real Men play Tuba

[IMG]http://img89.imageshack.us/img89/1859/newsmall6xz.jpg">

PH33R TEH 1337 Dwarf!

DONT CLICK ME!!1
Back to Top
choopie911 View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group
Avatar
Commie Canuck

Joined: 01 June 2003
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 30773
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote choopie911 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 13 March 2012 at 2:24pm
Originally posted by oldpbnoob oldpbnoob wrote:

I mean this in the best possible way, but can the Canadian contengency please stop using the term "we" when referring to money that the U.S. Taxpayers put towards NASA and space exploration?


When I say "we" I mean humans. Curiosity and exploration is important. Heck how little we know about our own oceans is mind boggling. Yes it's crazy huge, but it's ON OUR PLANET and we know more about the moon than the ocean floor.

Science needs funding, it's crucial to our progression in innumerable ways.
Back to Top
oldpbnoob View Drop Down
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Avatar
Not old, Not noob. May be Dave's grandma

Joined: 04 February 2008
Location: Yankee Stadium
Status: Offline
Points: 5676
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote oldpbnoob Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 13 March 2012 at 10:15am
Originally posted by Rofl_Mao Rofl_Mao wrote:

Originally posted by oldpbnoob oldpbnoob wrote:

I mean this in the best possible way, but can the Canadian contengency please stop using the term "we" when referring to money that the U.S. Taxpayers put towards NASA and space exploration?


I'm sorry, I didn't know the USA owned the solar system. Excuse me.
Apology accepted. Don't let it happen again.
"When I grow up I want to marry a rich man and live in a condor next to the beach" -- My 7yr old daughter.
Back to Top
Rofl_Mao View Drop Down
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Avatar
request denied

Joined: 27 October 2008
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 3210
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Rofl_Mao Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 13 March 2012 at 10:03am
Originally posted by oldpbnoob oldpbnoob wrote:

I mean this in the best possible way, but can the Canadian contengency please stop using the term "we" when referring to money that the U.S. Taxpayers put towards NASA and space exploration?


I'm sorry, I didn't know the USA owned the solar system. Excuse me.
Back to Top
usafpilot07 View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group
Avatar
FreeEnterprise's #1 Fan & Potty Mouth

Joined: 31 August 2004
Location: Tokelau
Status: Offline
Points: 4626
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote usafpilot07 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 13 March 2012 at 10:03am
Originally posted by Mack Mack wrote:

Originally posted by oldpbnoob oldpbnoob wrote:

I mean this in the best possible way, but can the Canadian contengency please stop using the term "we" when referring to money that the U.S. Taxpayers put towards NASA and space exploration?


That was the Royal "We."


We don't HAVE royals in America. It's not our fault those silly Canucks still love the old broad. Smile
Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo
Back to Top
oldpbnoob View Drop Down
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Avatar
Not old, Not noob. May be Dave's grandma

Joined: 04 February 2008
Location: Yankee Stadium
Status: Offline
Points: 5676
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote oldpbnoob Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 13 March 2012 at 10:02am
Looking more into it, there is some sort of Canadian Space Agency, but funding is less that 1/3 of a billion per year.
"When I grow up I want to marry a rich man and live in a condor next to the beach" -- My 7yr old daughter.
Back to Top
Mack View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group
Avatar
Has no impulse! control

Joined: 13 January 2004
Location: 2nd Circle
Status: Offline
Points: 9906
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Mack Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 13 March 2012 at 10:00am
Originally posted by oldpbnoob oldpbnoob wrote:

I mean this in the best possible way, but can the Canadian contengency please stop using the term "we" when referring to money that the U.S. Taxpayers put towards NASA and space exploration?


That was the Royal "We."

Edited by Mack - 13 March 2012 at 10:01am
Back to Top
Lightningbolt View Drop Down
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Avatar
PHAT and PLAT

Joined: 10 July 2002
Location: bumping up
Status: Offline
Points: 5055
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Lightningbolt Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 13 March 2012 at 9:59am
Originally posted by Rofl_Mao Rofl_Mao wrote:

So, because we have "stalled," we should just keep cutting funding until we have nothing left to go on and rely on for-profit companies that have no interest in furthering humanity other than their own interests?

 Even if private companies wanted to go to new planets (or hell, even the moon (which is completely possible)) to mine their resources, it would cost way more than any company could afford or be willing to risk. And that is the major problem that we have with privatizing the space industry. I'm not trying to say we should travel through space and time, which I agree is well beyond our grasp for the next couple hundred years, I'm saying that we should be able to reach within our own solar system in a relatively short time - if we put the effort into it.

Edit: punctuation and formatting

Gubmint has a way of funding the private sector when it benefits them.  

What happened to Johny Private Sector Moonshot from England?



Edited by Lightningbolt - 13 March 2012 at 10:01am
Back to Top
oldpbnoob View Drop Down
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Avatar
Not old, Not noob. May be Dave's grandma

Joined: 04 February 2008
Location: Yankee Stadium
Status: Offline
Points: 5676
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote oldpbnoob Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 13 March 2012 at 9:54am
I mean this in the best possible way, but can the Canadian contengency please stop using the term "we" when referring to money that the U.S. Taxpayers put towards NASA and space exploration?
"When I grow up I want to marry a rich man and live in a condor next to the beach" -- My 7yr old daughter.
Back to Top
Rofl_Mao View Drop Down
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Avatar
request denied

Joined: 27 October 2008
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 3210
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Rofl_Mao Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 13 March 2012 at 9:51am
So, because we have "stalled," we should just keep cutting funding until we have nothing left to go on and rely on for-profit companies that have no interest in furthering humanity other than their own interests?

 Even if private companies wanted to go to new planets (or hell, even the moon (which is completely possible)) to mine their resources, it would cost way more than any company could afford or be willing to risk. And that is the major problem that we have with privatizing the space industry. I'm not trying to say we should travel through space and time, which I agree is well beyond our grasp for the next couple hundred years, I'm saying that we should be able to reach within our own solar system in a relatively short time - if we put the effort into it.

Edit: punctuation and formatting


Edited by Rofl_Mao - 13 March 2012 at 9:52am
Back to Top
oldpbnoob View Drop Down
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Avatar
Not old, Not noob. May be Dave's grandma

Joined: 04 February 2008
Location: Yankee Stadium
Status: Offline
Points: 5676
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote oldpbnoob Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 13 March 2012 at 8:17am
Originally posted by Rofl_Mao Rofl_Mao wrote:

Originally posted by oldpbnoob oldpbnoob wrote:

* I see you edited it. Your original time was only 20 years. My point was that we have stalled it seems shortly after reaching the moon.


Sorry about that, but I get what your saying for the relative short term, but I'm trying to talk long-term.
Right, and long term, we look to have stalled. There is a massive technology jump from shooting big bottle rockets up into space and being capable of warping time and space to be able to reach other planets within a matter of days/months. We may have come a long ways, but we are not even close to something on this scale. Relatively speaking, we are still using rocks to clean pelts compared to where we need to be for this type of technology.
"When I grow up I want to marry a rich man and live in a condor next to the beach" -- My 7yr old daughter.
Back to Top
Rofl_Mao View Drop Down
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Avatar
request denied

Joined: 27 October 2008
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 3210
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Rofl_Mao Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 13 March 2012 at 8:11am
Originally posted by oldpbnoob oldpbnoob wrote:

* I see you edited it. Your original time was only 20 years. My point was that we have stalled it seems shortly after reaching the moon.


Sorry about that, but I get what your saying for the relative short term, but I'm trying to talk long-term.
Back to Top
RoboCop View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group
Avatar
Aw man, my butt is rusted...

Joined: 06 November 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 5196
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote RoboCop Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12 March 2012 at 10:26pm
I'm more interested in finding other planets that are habitable. Not because I think we will get there, that would take a group of people populating themselves and training children strictly how to colonize a different planet, but to find other life forms. It's not realistic to send people past our solar system. Even if man were to go into the deep part of our solar system, they would be gone for so long they would be extremely disconnected. I believe it is fully possible to go to farther planets but it would be costly. If we could find other life, it would be the biggest discovery ever. I'm sure the churches would be freaking out. As a Christian, I believe there is other life. How could we be the only ones when there are so many possibilities? We have discovered some similar Earth planets, but they are always too hot and life wouldn't be possible. We just have to keep looking. It doesn't help we can barely observe other planets until they pass I front of their host star.

I love being a physics major with an astronomy minor.
Back to Top
tallen702 View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group
Avatar
Hipster before Hipster was cool...

Joined: 10 June 2002
Location: Under Your Bed
Status: Offline
Points: 11850
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote tallen702 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12 March 2012 at 9:13pm
Originally posted by Benjichang Benjichang wrote:

I just wonder if we'll all kill ourselves and the planet before we really figure out how to get off of it.


I don't doubt that a rather large "cull" will occur before too much longer (in a geological time-scale sense) but the chances of the entire human race being wiped out by our own devices is slim when you actually sit down and think about it. By the end of the last ice age, the estimated human population for the whole planet was only around 20,000. That's less than half the population of the very small city I grew up in. Fairbanks, Alaska has more permanent residents than that by over 10k. If humankind was able to bounce back from that with nothing more than neolithic tools and hunter-gatherer lifestyles, I'm pretty sure we're resilient enough to deal with most of what could be thrown at us, especially given the wealth of shared knowledge we now possess not only online, but in good old-fashioned books.
Back to Top
Lightningbolt View Drop Down
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Avatar
PHAT and PLAT

Joined: 10 July 2002
Location: bumping up
Status: Offline
Points: 5055
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Lightningbolt Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12 March 2012 at 8:58pm
Yeah we're fixing it real good right now
Back to Top
Benjichang View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group
Avatar
I pwned Leroy Jenkins!

Joined: 03 January 2004
Location: Ohiya
Status: Offline
Points: 12618
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Benjichang Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12 March 2012 at 8:46pm
I just wonder if we'll all kill ourselves and the planet before we really figure out how to get off of it.

irc.esper.net
#paintball
Back to Top
oldpbnoob View Drop Down
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Avatar
Not old, Not noob. May be Dave's grandma

Joined: 04 February 2008
Location: Yankee Stadium
Status: Offline
Points: 5676
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote oldpbnoob Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12 March 2012 at 8:01pm
Originally posted by tallen702 tallen702 wrote:

within the next thousand years, there simply will not be enough land, enough resources, enough of anything for the human race to continue to not only grow, 
Of course there is some school of thought that something will happen before this time to thin the herd.
"When I grow up I want to marry a rich man and live in a condor next to the beach" -- My 7yr old daughter.
Back to Top
tallen702 View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group
Avatar
Hipster before Hipster was cool...

Joined: 10 June 2002
Location: Under Your Bed
Status: Offline
Points: 11850
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote tallen702 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12 March 2012 at 7:55pm
The word "Lit.erally" screws it all up....
Back to Top
tallen702 View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group
Avatar
Hipster before Hipster was cool...

Joined: 10 June 2002
Location: Under Your Bed
Status: Offline
Points: 11850
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote tallen702 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12 March 2012 at 7:50pm

What is truly important about going to other bodies within our own solar system is that we will need to tap the resources available out there to continue our own existence and advancement. Not only will we need the room, be it off-world colonies or cities in orbit, but we will need to expand the well from which we draw our resources. We only have finite amounts of rare elements and many, many other important elements to continue to advance our technology. It is estimated that some of the asteroids in our own belt, just between us and Mars, hold more of these elements in their relatively small bodies, than our entire planet does in its crust.


It is impossible to know exactly what our future holds, but we have to remember that we actaully have a few billion years to figure out faster than light travel in some form or another to get us to other systems and other planets. This would allow us to continue on past the death of our own life-giving star. To think that we are at the top of our game in physics and technology, to be able to say that interstellar travel is "farcical" is in and of itself a farce.

Where ND-T errs in his speech is to assume that during the space race, and even after the moon landings, the general public felt that NASA and space exploration were worth funding. They almost never did. The reality is that the only time in public record that opinion swung to the side of "the funding is worth the end result" was the year that we landed on the moon for the first time. All years leading up to, and following the initial moon landing point to less than half the population of the US supporting the costs associated with such scientific strides. We've simply been sold the myth of the supportive nation wanting to beat the Ruskies to the moon. In reality, we'd probably have never had to do so if we'd simply used a Redstone missile to put a satellite into orbit far earlier than the Russians with their R7 rocket family which were (and still are) essentially modified ICBMs.

Degrasse-Tyson likes to talk about how we used to "Dream" when the reality is that he draws on commercial marketing ploys rather than scientific advances of the day. In reality, commercialization did more to fuel his idyllic "dream" than any cold, hard science from JPL or Goddard.

Also, the music is from "Una Mattina" by Ludvico Einauldi who is a fantastic pianist and composer. I own the album. It is fantastic.

Edited by tallen702 - 12 March 2012 at 7:54pm
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 678910 11>
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.04
Copyright ©2001-2021 Web Wiz Ltd.

This page was generated in 0.344 seconds.