![]() |
I hate Mayor Mike.... |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 456 |
Author | ||||
usafpilot07 ![]() Moderator Group ![]() ![]() FreeEnterprise's #1 Fan & Potty Mouth Joined: 31 August 2004 Location: Tokelau Status: Offline Points: 4626 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||
Having not read pages four or five yet, I nominate this quote as worst argument of the thread, and maybe of all time. |
||||
Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo
|
||||
![]() |
||||
Kayback ![]() Moderator Group ![]() ![]() Ask me about my Kokido Joined: 25 July 2002 Location: South Africa Status: Offline Points: 4183 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||
They should make the price the same as 2 x 8oz.
The main problem, and research has shown which is why companies do it, people will pay more for what they don't want, if they think they are getting a bargain. Only $1 more for double the amount? Sure! I'm still curious to see FE's reply to the sugar-level-in-wine statements from a week ago..... KBK |
||||
Pedicabo ego vos et irrumabo. H = 2
|
||||
![]() |
||||
usafpilot07 ![]() Moderator Group ![]() ![]() FreeEnterprise's #1 Fan & Potty Mouth Joined: 31 August 2004 Location: Tokelau Status: Offline Points: 4626 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||
I don't think the food laws ever hit us while I was there(graduated in 07), but who knows. I ate a frozen round pizza thing, French fries, cookies, and sweet tea almost every day Sophomore-Senior years, and I turned out fine. It comes down to parents feeding their kids better at home, and keeping them active. After that, they turn 18 and have to decide what kind of care they want to take of themselves. |
||||
Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo
|
||||
![]() |
||||
Kayback ![]() Moderator Group ![]() ![]() Ask me about my Kokido Joined: 25 July 2002 Location: South Africa Status: Offline Points: 4183 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||
Don't want to let this drop off the page before FE responds to the wine sugar level comments.
|
||||
Pedicabo ego vos et irrumabo. H = 2
|
||||
![]() |
||||
FreeEnterprise ![]() Moderator Group ![]() ![]() Not a card-carrying member of the DNC Joined: 14 October 2008 Location: Trails Of Doom Status: Offline Points: 4910 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||
Bloomberg is doing this because he thinks the people in his city are too fat. So the calories per drink is what he wants to reduce.
Look at the calories per bottle of wine, (since it is rarely sold by the glass). IF he really wanted to curb obesity, why would he not ban the stuff HE drinks?... Since it packs a ton of calories and makes people fat... That was my point.
|
||||
They tremble at my name...
![]() |
||||
![]() |
||||
mbro ![]() Moderator Group ![]() ![]() Original Forum Gangster Joined: 11 June 2002 Location: Isle Of Man Status: Offline Points: 10750 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||
Because people consume far more soda than wine?
|
||||
![]() Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos. |
||||
![]() |
||||
tallen702 ![]() Moderator Group ![]() ![]() Hipster before Hipster was cool... Joined: 10 June 2002 Location: Under Your Bed Status: Offline Points: 11856 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||
Speaks fer yourshelfs there meester "I don't drinks da wines all day" *hic* |
||||
<Removed overly wide sig. Tsk, you know better.>
|
||||
![]() |
||||
usafpilot07 ![]() Moderator Group ![]() ![]() FreeEnterprise's #1 Fan & Potty Mouth Joined: 31 August 2004 Location: Tokelau Status: Offline Points: 4626 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||
I bet the majority of obese people in New York are fat because of alcohol. |
||||
Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo
|
||||
![]() |
||||
Eville ![]() Moderator Group ![]() ![]() More than 'evil' but not quite 'eviller' Joined: 19 September 2008 Status: Offline Points: 3473 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||
Wine is sold by the glass in nearly every restaurant I have err been in. When wine is bought by the bOttle, it is shared by several people. When is the last time you saw a table sharing a large coke?
|
||||
![]() |
||||
![]() |
||||
Kayback ![]() Moderator Group ![]() ![]() Ask me about my Kokido Joined: 25 July 2002 Location: South Africa Status: Offline Points: 4183 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||
Since when was the sugar content the exact same thing a the calorie content when discussing how there is too much sugar in soda?
Its very easy to win your argument by simply changing what you were saying when you get caught out making blatant errors when stating fact. The grass it red. No it is green. What I meant was it isn't blue! On the whole I'd say the calorie content of a nice meal is higher than the calories on fast food. The last meal I had a "nice" wine with consisted of bread for the table, dips for the bread, a soup, Kudu fillet, julliened sweet vegetables, roast potatoes, champagne based cream sauce and a creme brulle with coffee. Those calories kicked the ass of the medium Big Mac I had for lunch yesterday. The calorie content of the wine or the soda was almost a by the bye. The wine my wife and I had was sold by the glass. In fact we most often get it by the glass, because a bottle will put many people over the legal driving limit. You can get it by the glass at many top places. For example La Colombe which is in the top 20 list of the best restaurants in the world, they sell expensive wines by the glass. I know, we eat there often. The wine is often more expensive than the food. So that argument is rather moot. Do people consume too many calories? Yes. Is soda/wine part of the problem? Yes. Is the argument you put forwards valid? No. KBK |
||||
Pedicabo ego vos et irrumabo. H = 2
|
||||
![]() |
||||
FreeEnterprise ![]() Moderator Group ![]() ![]() Not a card-carrying member of the DNC Joined: 14 October 2008 Location: Trails Of Doom Status: Offline Points: 4910 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||
My bad Kayback... I said sugar, but should have said calories. Since calories make you fat... Which was what bloomberg was referencing with the ban... You know, fat people.
I'm sorry I was wrong and caused you so much distress.
|
||||
They tremble at my name...
![]() |
||||
![]() |
||||
Kayback ![]() Moderator Group ![]() ![]() Ask me about my Kokido Joined: 25 July 2002 Location: South Africa Status: Offline Points: 4183 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||
Lol and then you are condescending about it.
You're really good at this "debate" thing. KBK |
||||
Pedicabo ego vos et irrumabo. H = 2
|
||||
![]() |
||||
Mack ![]() Moderator Group ![]() ![]() Has no impulse! control Joined: 13 January 2004 Location: 2nd Circle Status: Offline Points: 9906 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||
There were a couple of comments made that made me start thinking about
this topic in relation to, for lack of a better (shorter) term,
Obamacare. Especially, since SCOTUS has essentially given it the
go-ahead.
The gist I'm getting from this is that since the government is/will be footing the bill for people's health care then the government has a right to interfere with people's lives to keep costs down by forcing them to live/eat healthier. If we take this to the next logical step, then perhaps only people who can afford to have children should be allowed to have them . . . after all, the government, will already be helping pay for the birth, if the people having kids can't afford to take care of them why shouldn't the government interfere here as well to keep costs down on programs such as welfare, foodstamps, etc. It all seems a little Orewellian to me . . . slippery sloped, etc. Edited PS: I almost forgot . . . "They're gonna off grandma!" Edited by Mack - 02 July 2012 at 1:53am |
||||
![]() |
||||
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 456 |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |