The "S" word

correction thats not my opinion, its a fact

Tranlation:  I'm still jumping up and down and going "I'm right, I'm right, I'm right" in hopes that mindless repetition will make everyone forget that I can't support my opinion with logic or evidence.

(runs away before catching more flak)

Translation:  I forum the same way most so called paintball snipers plays paintball;  by hiding like a sissy-chicken and not really getting involved in what's going on.

KillerBD wrote: Wow, I didn't read that whole thing...* Translation: I don't really understand the argument presented which proves that snipers don't exist in paintball, but I don't care anyway because I am impervious to logic.  But I still stand by my original opinion, their can be snipers in paintball. Translation:  Being impervious to logic, I choose not to offer logical arguments in response to this but instead merely continue to insist that I am right based on the fact that I can't understand the basic theory behind logical debates. You may disagree but thats your own OPINION. Translation:  I am now doing the internet equivalent of balling up my fists and jumping up and down while repeating the words "I'm right." correction thats not my opinion, its a fact Tranlation:  I'm still jumping up and down and going "I'm right, I'm right, I'm right" in hopes that mindless repetition will make everyone forget that I can't support my opinion with logic or evidence. (runs away before catching more flak) Translation:  I forum the same way most so called paintball snipers plays paintball;  by hiding like a sissy-chicken and not really getting involved in what's going on.

Translation: I am closed minded I believe that I am wright in reguards with this argument. Anyone who disagrees with me or my logic shall face the wrath of God. For I believe that I am God on this forum and I can translate written text into different words that people are really thinking..... Or I'm just ignorant, one of the two...

Mack wrote: KillerBD wrote: Wow, I didn't read that whole thing...* Translation: I don't really understand the argument presented which proves that snipers don't exist in paintball, but I don't care anyway because I am impervious to logic.  But I still stand by my original opinion, their can be snipers in paintball. Translation:  Being impervious to logic, I choose not to offer logical arguments in response to this but instead merely continue to insist that I am right based on the fact that I can't understand the basic theory behind logical debates. You may disagree but thats your own OPINION. Translation:  I am now doing the internet equivalent of balling up my fists and jumping up and down while repeating the words "I'm right." correction thats not my opinion, its a fact Tranlation:  I'm still jumping up and down and going "I'm right, I'm right, I'm right" in hopes that mindless repetition will make everyone forget that I can't support my opinion with logic or evidence. (runs away before catching more flak) Translation:  I forum the same way most so called paintball snipers plays paintball;  by hiding like a sissy-chicken and not really getting involved in what's going on. *This comment destroyed the meager remnants of your already tattered credibility.  Translation: I am closed minded Only to arguments that are based on the internet equivalent of childish tantrums as opposed to facts/logic. I believe that I am wright in reguards with this argument. Actually, I believe I am right in regards to this argument.  (As an off-topic question, how can you still have spelling errors when the forum underlines many misspelled words for you?) Anyone who disagrees with me or my logic shall face the wrath of God. Interesting postulation, but incorrect.  Those who disagree with me do not face the wrath of God, but may have to face the logic of Mack. (McLogic) For I believe that I am God No, not really.  I believe that I represent the side of the paintball sniper debate that, in this case, actually tried to support their position with something more substantial than "I'm right 'cause I think I'm right." on this forum and I can translate written text into different words that people are really thinking..... I never claimed to know what you are thinking.  I did however use sarcasm to point out the fallacies/inconsistencies/lack of support contained within your arguments. Or I'm just ignorant, Name calling . . . hmmm . . . you now have me writhing in the grasp of your superior debating skills.  (Sarcasm) one of the two...

Interesting translations point well taken

Fyi no I didn't read the whole statement because I could care less.

Then why do you keep arguing this point?

Mainly because many (not all) people on this forum spend more time arguing about paintball and shooting down other paintballers ideas rather than playing the game for what it is.

Everyone is entitled to their own opinion.  What everyone is not entitled to, as pointed out earlier by Brihard, is expressing that opinion and having it instantly and unquestionably accepted by others.  Once someone leaves the safety of their metaphorical cave, they should expect challenges.  When challenged, they should not be surprised to find that others fail to agree with their preconceived notions.  They should also not be surprised to find that others, not considering the individual in question as special as they consider themselves to be*, expect that individual to provide some type of logic/proof/evidence to support those positions/opinions that differ from the ones that the others consider valid. 

Failing to provide the aforementioned proof will invariably result in the non-acceptance of the individual's position.  Insistence that the individual is right for no other reason than the individual thinks he is right, combined with admitting to not even considering/evaluating the opposing viewpoints, can result in derision and mockery as well.

*Yes, this was intentionally written to be capable of multiple interpretations.

Sorry for rant.