Best 98c to M4 I have seen

As I want to make something like this I’ll give a full review of what I think.

Wow this looks nicer than what I had planned to do to mine, eh Detrevni?!  Don’t answer that. lol

It is the best I’ve seen.  But it’s still not perfect imo…

Things he did perfectly:

--The transfer from real parts (the tiny useless pieces on the left side of marker) they look great (oh and there are some on the right side too) - make it look real.

--The way the launcher is attached makes the 98 C not look so awkwardly long [from the part from the end of the mag to the end of the Tippmann marker (not including barrel)] It seems shorter, which is good on the 98!  The only other way to compensate is to mod a magazine somewhere in the middle between the end of the marker and the trigger.

--No hose on the outside of the marker or no ASA.

--The magazine in the second picture… BEA… UTIFUL

--Has a real AR15-A2 or A3 Sight Rail = best one. (Not BT, Tacamo or Tippmann).

Things I’d change/ don’t like

--The top sight, probably switch it with a larger Tasco Red dot sight (42mm?!) (personal pref).

--Filling in the warning caution words on the left side of the marker.

--Removing the side feedneck cyclone numbs (considering he’s not using them)

--I’d still run a cyclone over a Q-Loader on it, any day.

--The grenade launcher is massive (getting a hold of a Scepter, would be the best – yes they are out of production though).

--Milling the Tippmann lettering off.

--Filling in the part that had the Custom Pro words with bondo or JB weld then sanding smooth.

--Stick a BT sealed bolt over the cocking handle rather than leaving it open. (not the Rocket cock as it doesn’t match nicely on milsims).

--Paintjob is badly done imo.  I’d redo with real duracoat paint, using airbrush and air compressor and stencil make it a Digital woodsland or even better, a MARPAT digi camo.

--The adapter above the A2 or A3 Sight Rail has a gap/loop/round part where there is no metal.  There are nicer looking sight rail adapters than that one.

Things I’m indecisive about

--The rear stock is imo a tad uglier than the Tapco stocks (which is now owned by PCS). Most M-4’s I’ve seen have stock the Tapco style stocks.  But he has an airline going through his stock which you can’t do with a Tapco stock, so it makes up for it.

--The grip is nice and real looking, but doesn’t look as comfortable as Dye Sticky’s (Dye Sticky’s 1^st version looks fine on milsim guns and is comfortable).

-- He used a good quality barrel but if he is going for the all M-4 look he could have used a milsim barrel or stuck a muzzle break at the end.

-- He used a very nice shroud but I’m trying to see it in my mind without the holes in the shroud (not my personal pref) and maybe only a top and bottom rail, instead of 4. IDK I just think I’ve seen some that resemble the M-4 more than that one, and that look (maybe) a bit better but I’m indecisive.

All in all, Damn, that thing is great!!

I give it a 9.25/10