The 2016 election.

That is terrible. The USA is doomed with Hilary as president.

Deleted

Edited by SSOK - 16 August 2016 at 4:50am

oldsoldier wrote: Really, you know better. Hate to 'p' in your corn flakes but there are polls that show a very different picture out there as well.

agentwhale007 wrote: God wrote: The USA is doomed with Hilary as president. Seems like a little bit of hyperbole.

Meh. It's the same exact hyperbole that the Clinton Cadets are all spouting about Trump.


I don't like the way any of it smells. When the DNC can have evidence presented against them stating that they were, or were planning to undercut their own in-house competition to secure the nomination for Hillary, what are they doing/willing to do in their bid against Trump?
There's just way too much that she's been mixed up in, implicated in, and murky on that it's far too much to be simply the right throwing feces at her to see what sticks.

On the other hand, Trump is off his rocker, lacking even the most basic skill-set required to be a successful statesman. You won't catch me often agreeing with Obama, but when he said that Trump is "woefully unprepared" for the job, he was right.

There's no honesty, no transparency, nothing at all that can or should be liked about either of them, nor the rabid miscreants that fail to realize the shortcomings of their favorite candidate.

Truth be told? They're two halves of the same coin. Both out for their own gain, and willing to tell you anything that you'll want to hear at any given time.

I'm hoping against hope that third party and independent voters take enough electorates away so that neither candidate earns enough to secure the presidency, and it goes to the house for appointment.
That won't happen though, and even though I won't be casting a ballot for either of the two, I've been pretty sure that she'll end up taking the election....whether by gain or by game, she'll end up in the White House.





Edited by Reb Cpl - 16 August 2016 at 1:04pm

Reb Cpl wrote:   Meh. It's the same exact hyperbole that the Clinton Cadets are all spouting about Trump.

 

tallen702 wrote: Because they can't bring themselves to make the real comparison.

That is the point of this idiocy. This is the first election of the modern era where BOTH candidates are a 'no win' for the country. These polls are all over the map, the annonomous 'poll' where people are asked, with no names, these people state they feel safer saying they like Trump rather than Hillary, to the point that knowing if they put a Trump sticker on their bumper some Democrat will 'key' their car, or worse. The discourse and us v them attitude is over the top.

I am voting against Hillary and putting the 1st Predator back in the White House. Wish Johnson had 1/2 a chance as an alternative to this lunacy. We have a choice of a dysfunctional family, Hillary and Bill representing us to the world, and they know all about the 'Bill' issues. Or a wacked out NYC business type. Both have no idea how to address the issues we face, illegal immigration, secure immigration, the terror threat (Hillary and Obama don't even call it what it is for Christ's sake, and the vacuum they created pulling out US troops on a timetable created the JV Team of Terrorists), the economy, you name the problem, they don't have a clue, or solution only usual elect me promises ignored day one they take office.

This election really has no effect on me and mine as I am at the end of the 'run', my kids, grandkids, and most of you will feel the full force of this idiocy in your future, and best of luck to you.

At this point, all we can do is look at the qualifications. Who is better qualified for the job? It might suck, but that's what it's coming down to, IMO.

tallen702 wrote: Benjichang wrote: At this point, all we can do is look at the qualifications. Who is better qualified for the job? It might suck, but that's what it's coming down to, IMO. Sooo, Johnson/Weld. Because that's who it comes down to on qualifications. They're the only duo that have any executive level political experience. It should be noted that they're also pretty well liked by folks on both sides.

Yeah, but what's their shot of actually winning?

Benjichang wrote: tallen702 wrote: Benjichang wrote: At this point, all we can do is look at the qualifications. Who is better qualified for the job? It might suck, but that's what it's coming down to, IMO. Sooo, Johnson/Weld. Because that's who it comes down to on qualifications. They're the only duo that have any executive level political experience. It should be noted that they're also pretty well liked by folks on both sides. Yeah, but what's their shot of actually winning?

Pretty good if people would get their collective heads out of their collective butts and quit with the "oh, well, I want my vote to matter" bull-crap.