![]() |
Does America need 4 Armed Forces’? |
Post Reply
|
Page 123> |
| Author | |||
Sammy
Platinum Member
Joined: 20 July 2002 Location: Switzerland Status: Offline Points: 4076 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Topic: Does America need 4 Armed Forces’?Posted: 24 August 2004 at 12:00am |
||
|
If you noticed i didnt put Marines on that list, because either in the Declaration of Independence or Constitution (i forgot) it says something about the Marines always being in the US Military. So which Special Force do you think we dont need as much as the others? Also remember this, the Air Force recieves more funding than all the other Armed Forces' combined...
EDIT. This isnt a favorite, least favorite thing, its which you think we no longer require. Edited by Sammy |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
|||
:ShockeR_ratm:
Member
Guested - Complete idiocy Joined: 05 May 2004 Location: Uruguay Status: Offline Points: 4046 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 24 August 2004 at 12:02am |
||
|
I think each is a necessity to the country
|
|||
Nobody ever suspects the fun police!
|
|||
![]() |
|||
Sammy
Platinum Member
Joined: 20 July 2002 Location: Switzerland Status: Offline Points: 4076 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 24 August 2004 at 12:05am |
||
|
But if you think about it most countries only have 1-3. Air, Ground, and maybe sea. Also some of them might be combined, and i think the Marines and the Army have basically the same purpose therefore i put my vote for them.
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
|||
Panda Man
Platinum Member
I’ll feed you to my SNAKE!! METALFACE!! Joined: 25 July 2004 Location: Neutral Zone Status: Offline Points: 10605 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 24 August 2004 at 12:09am |
||
|
I think the Air Force and the Navy Can Combine into Each other. Also I think the Marines could be a Special Branch in the Army that you can join, kinda like Rangers and special Forces... |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
|||
:ShockeR_ratm:
Member
Guested - Complete idiocy Joined: 05 May 2004 Location: Uruguay Status: Offline Points: 4046 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 24 August 2004 at 12:15am |
||
|
That's because we kick so much more arse than other countries
|
|||
Nobody ever suspects the fun police!
|
|||
![]() |
|||
Panda Man
Platinum Member
I’ll feed you to my SNAKE!! METALFACE!! Joined: 25 July 2004 Location: Neutral Zone Status: Offline Points: 10605 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 24 August 2004 at 12:19am |
||
|
^ Russia + China = World Domination. If they ever teamed up and lost there mind The whole world would be **edit** |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
|||
Darur
Platinum Member
Stare directly into my avatar... Joined: 03 May 2003 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 9178 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 24 August 2004 at 2:00am |
||
|
None. I think we need them all.
|
|||
|
Real Men play Tuba
[IMG]http://img89.imageshack.us/img89/1859/newsmall6xz.jpg"> PH33R TEH 1337 Dwarf! DONT CLICK ME!!1 |
|||
![]() |
|||
SlipKnoTpb
Member
Joined: 12 February 2004 Location: Djibouti Status: Offline Points: 644 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 24 August 2004 at 2:09am |
||
*e: if china and russia teamed up they wouldnt last very long. everyone knows communism doesnt work. havent you seen Enemy at the Gates? Edited by SlipKnoTpb |
|||
|
über Schuss!
|
|||
![]() |
|||
chs61224
Member
Joined: 10 June 2002 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 729 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 24 August 2004 at 2:47am |
||
Russia isn't a communist state it is a federation, and don't cite movies when commenting on anything political. And another thing how does Enemy at the Gates show Communism doesn't work? I thought it just reaffirmed that Stalin killed millions of his own citizens. |
|||
|
All about the Snow.
|
|||
![]() |
|||
Panda Man
Platinum Member
I’ll feed you to my SNAKE!! METALFACE!! Joined: 25 July 2004 Location: Neutral Zone Status: Offline Points: 10605 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 24 August 2004 at 4:25am |
||
|
Communisum Can work... You just have to worry about the Fat White Capatalist Sticking his Fat nose in there buisness...
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
|||
dye prs
Member
Diapers?? Joined: 07 July 2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 283 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 24 August 2004 at 5:07am |
||
|
ok for real none. wth . every one who posted none i hope u dont live in my country(usa) thsi is the planet earth. WE FIGHT AND KILL AS HUMANS (with the capps ) if we didnt have any we woudl be taken over so fastly. ugh u ppl dont even count as real humans just go away. i really want to beat the POOP out of u guys who said none. just do urself a something good and kill ur self. or at least stop being stupid. hfc.
~Seth~ |
|||
![]() |
|||
dye prs
Member
Diapers?? Joined: 07 July 2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 283 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 24 August 2004 at 5:13am |
||
panda man. ur cool and all but for real. china and that other plac that shoudlnt even be called a country. 00o they have a 3million man army. so they have nothing to back it up with. only till now have they been aloud to buil new guns tanks plans every thing sences ww2. were so far ahead of every one technicoly its crazy. like look into the new camo we have (makes the person 80% invisable) the land warrier system all that b/s its awsome and crazy. and plus if all els faile we have about 28 million more nuclear missiles then the rest of this planet. america would rather waste this planet and every thing on it b4 we lost a war to china or any one els. and the new fighter were putting into service (y-f22) ahh no one will ever beat th u.s. |
|||
![]() |
|||
Koolit32
Platinum Member
1 strike, language in link 4/10/10 Joined: 23 October 2002 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 5242 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 24 August 2004 at 5:17am |
||
|
The thing is, we have them all... you can't just boot one. Imagine how
many soldiers we would lose on a transfer from one service to another?
|
|||
![]() |
|||
S\/\/4T-L()G4N
Platinum Member
Anybody in the town wanna bounce around? Joined: 22 July 2003 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 3271 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 24 August 2004 at 7:07am |
||
Correct me if I am wrong. Air force is all home land, navy is mostly over seas. I don't get what combining would do. They are both necessary.
You totally missed the whole point of none. The vote is which branch can we do without...none meaning we need them all... |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
|||
dye prs
Member
Diapers?? Joined: 07 July 2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 283 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 24 August 2004 at 7:20am |
||
0o0o ok. but hey if it ment none as in we dont need anything i would of been so rite lol ^______^ |
|||
![]() |
|||
pballa123
Gold Member
Will now work & play well with others Joined: 28 May 2003 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 1226 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 24 August 2004 at 8:06am |
||
|
the air force recieves more funding because they need more funding... it costs a lot more to design a nice new aircraft than to a design a spiffy new gun. not to mention all the other classified research and development the air force does. We should keep them all and we will. although, the marines and army are very similar(at least it seems) im sure an expert can point out some vital differnces. anyhow, as koolit said we have them all, so whether they should or should not be they are staying. all of them.
|
|||
![]() |
|||
roadrunner0535
Member
Joined: 21 August 2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 945 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 24 August 2004 at 8:14am |
||
|
no doubt, we need all of them, we have land, air and sea...and
then all the special 1's for the better warriors or stealtheir* warriors
*i killed that werd |
|||
|
98c seclusion
14" dye ultralite rufus dawg 2x stick trigg remote full-auto mod My 98C 100% smart parts |
|||
![]() |
|||
MSG.Mobius
Member
Strike 1, "S-Bomb" & More (F18) Joined: 28 May 2004 Status: Offline Points: 1472 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 24 August 2004 at 8:14am |
||
|
1. Special Forces is a small group of elite soldiers, Delta Force, Navy S.E.A.L.s etc. 2. I think Jet Planes and Jet Plane recearch requiers a little more money. And BTW removing an Armed Forces, thats pretty retarded. Havn't you heard of Air, Land and Sea? So we need atleast those, about Marines and Army, well Army I read was a harder task. The Marines are a combination of all that, they almost act by themselves in conflicts. I don't think either should be removed, if your upset about funding, then make a poll "Should the Armed Forces funding be decreased" |
|||
Coming in May 2005! |
|||
![]() |
|||
cadet_sergeant
Platinum Member
More power to deflector shields, Scotty! Joined: 23 November 2003 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 2538 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 24 August 2004 at 8:22am |
||
|
the Airforce came form the Army in the mid 1900's (theres a cadence about it they sing @ westpoint) the Marines are still a deparment of the Navy, and the Army has be around since 1775. i say they need to stick to what there main purpuse is, Army = ground pounders, Airforce = flying, Navy = sea defence. the only exception to this should be the SEALS. (BTW seals have a 10.9 billion dollar budget but thats from 1995 when my uncle retired [capt. 0-6], its probley more now)
|
|||
![]() |
|||
S\/\/4T-L()G4N
Platinum Member
Anybody in the town wanna bounce around? Joined: 22 July 2003 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 3271 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 24 August 2004 at 9:17am |
||
|
Forgetting something important again.
You guys say that the air force has the most money because they are designing jet aircraft. Look at the navy. A) Think about the money that goes into building, planning, maintaining, and fueling ships. On top of that aircraft carriers. B) The navy has the largest number of aircraft. More then the airforce. Your chances of becoming a navy pilot are a lot better than your chances of becoming a airforce pilot. Doesn't the airforce fund NASA? I think that is where a lot of the money goes. |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
|||
Post Reply
|
Page 123> |
|
Tweet
|
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |