![]() |
The RAP4 Milsim |
Post Reply
|
| Author | |
Giblet
Member
Joined: 21 August 2004 Status: Offline Points: 81 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Topic: The RAP4 MilsimPosted: 01 October 2004 at 2:05pm |
|
anyone ever use one of these or know how they perform? They look like a really neat idea but i dont know how well the .40 caliber paintball would work since it has less mass i would assume it wouldn't travel as far and the whatnot. anyone have any info or opinions on these. They also have a really really cool pistol. PS. Im not looking at buying one but if they perform really well then maybe in the future i would look into it. If I get into scenario games more I'll seriously look into the pistol. Edited by Giblet |
|
![]() |
|
Jeet Kune Do
Member
Joined: 14 August 2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 57 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 01 October 2004 at 2:52pm |
|
Ive never used one, but why would less mass equal less travel.Since its
not as big as a .60 caliber paintball there less wind resitance. Also
it uses less air to push it since its lighter. So technically if you
put a 40 caliber into a marker and shot it. THen put a 60 caliber into
the marker with the same air setting the 40 caliber would go farther.
|
|
![]() |
|
freakripper
Member
Joined: 01 October 2004 Status: Offline Points: 3 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 01 October 2004 at 3:23pm |
|
I have had one of the first models that was just full auto and then later i sold that and got one of the newer ones that can be switched from full to semi. But I hated it cause it have the same range as a tippmann or regular gun. i mean it was good for playing indoors but for woods ball if you play with some one with a real paintball gun they can out shoot you big time I like my AT-85 better. but that is just my two cents
freakripper |
|
![]() |
|
sinisterNorth
Moderator Group
1 strike, language, 10/3 Joined: 30 May 2004 Location: PA Status: Offline Points: 10463 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 01 October 2004 at 4:53pm |
|
I prsonall havent used one, but guys at local shops and fields seem to dislike them. I think its because the paint is so expensive for a case. They look cool, but i would never use one. I'm not into the whole life-like gun idea.
|
|
|
Pumpker'd; (V.) When a pump player runs up and shoots you at point blank range because you thought 20bps made you good.
|
|
![]() |
|
Giblet
Member
Joined: 21 August 2004 Status: Offline Points: 81 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 01 October 2004 at 10:37pm |
|
I just think the gun is really cool looking and the whole actualy using a realistic clip is really cool too. The pistol though it really neat for how compact it is. If i got anything from them first would have to be the pistol. But hell why buy the pistol when i could get a new a-5 for less. yeah paint is expensive. to comment on the less mass = more distance try throwing a styrafome(sp?) ball and a base ball and see which one flies straiter and is less affected by air resistence. you can try a smaller styrafome ball if you want not matter what more force can be put behind the more massive object. |
|
![]() |
|
Post Reply
|
|
|
Tweet
|
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |