Wait wait wait.... Which Anonymous is this now?

Fed up with whose crap? WBC's? I hope someone does something even if 10 idiots go to jail for it.

I really would love to see WBC destroyed. Wawawa I'm un-American prohibiting freedom of speech, but seriously they should die.

Since when is /b/ homophobic anyway?

jmac3 wrote: Fed up with whose crap? WBC's? I hope someone does something even if 10 idiots go to jail for it.

That's exactly what they want.  They want to offend enough people that someone assaults them, and then they sue.

stratoaxe wrote: And I knew that wasn't /b/ when they expressed distate at WBC's lack of Christ-likeness.

/b/ and anonymous is not a single entity.

Anonymous is whoever feels like doing something and then claiming they represent ANONYMOUS LEGION. You know like blowing up vans and such.

/b/ is half 12 year olds.

Point being, who cares who it is. Every person(maybe single person) who wrote that to WBC could frequent /b/ everyday or not, who knows.

Edited by agentwhale007 - 20 February 2011 at 3:38pm

choopie911 wrote: High Voltage wrote: __sneaky__ wrote: It's not /b/. /b/'s version of anonymous is the one that should come to mind when you hear about all the cyber bullying stories. The Anonymous that you think of in relation to the Scientology protests, recent support of Wikileaks, and such is a separate entity that for the most part has separated itself from /b/. Wrong, wrong, wrong. Anonymous doesn't have separate sects nor is it confined to one site. Anonymous isn't homophobic, many gays are part of anon. Just stay out of this one newb. Agreed, you're trying to add hierarchy and divisions that simply do not exist.

I didn't mean to imply that they were seperate sects. I just hardly believe that the same people who troll 12 year olds are the same people who end up DDOSing major corporations, because of some slimy thing that they've done. Anonymous isn't even technically a set group, there are no leaders, and people can help, or ignore as they please. And I never said Anon was homophobic 

Linus wrote: homeless shelter.

Linus wrote: You'll find me bankrupt and in a homeless shelter soon.

Edited by ammolord - 20 February 2011 at 6:13pm

Linus wrote: I'm tired of anonymous. They are hypocritical fat-ass geeks that live in their parents basement and have no real-world social abilities.   Did I mention they are hypocritical?

I can just taste the ignorance.

Linus wrote: choopie911 wrote: Linus wrote: I'm tired of anonymous. They are hypocritical fat-ass geeks that live in their parents basement and have no real-world social abilities.   Did I mention they are hypocritical? I can just taste the ignorance. How so? They claim to be advocates of free speech, yet attack private companies that exercise their own free speech. If that's no hypocritical, I don't know what is.

What companies have they attacked for exercising free speech?

My ignorance comment wasn't about them being hypocritical, but your blatantly oblivious stereotyping. Also, I'm not sure a non-group-group can be hypocritical when they don't really have core values to start with. They are everyone and nobody and anybody who participates. The construction of the participants will vary from time to time, as will the aspects and values of those involved. Yes, I agree they are contradictory, but its sort of the nature of how they work.